Costin Paval vs Cengiz Aksu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paval vs Aksu analysis and find out who is favored!
Costin Paval vs Cengiz Aksu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paval has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Aksu has won 47.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paval, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Aksu has won 55.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.32% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paval has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aksu has saved 50.83% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paval has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Aksu winning 46.15% (W/L 18/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paval has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 21/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Aksu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 44/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 98/ 91).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paval winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paval winning 2 and Aksu winning 0. The last match between Paval and Aksu was at the M15 Antalya, 03-03-2020, Q3, Clay with Costin Paval getting the victory 7-5 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paval and Aksu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paval winning 0 times and Aksu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paval winning 0, and Aksu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paval has played against opponents with an average rank of while Aksu has played against players with an average rank of 108.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paval has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aksu has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paval has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aksu has converted 49.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paval 1 - 0 Aksu
Costin Paval
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
722
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
Cengiz Aksu
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
48% (76-81)
Career Total W/L
53% (142-128)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Costin Paval | Cengiz Aksu |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Costin Paval | Cengiz Aksu |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (18/17) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (165/158) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.1 |
Aces Total | 0 | 16 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 31 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:26:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 63.13 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (553/837) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (349/553) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (129/284) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (47/90) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (377/869) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Costin Paval Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Costin Paval
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Costin Paval
Player
Dragos Dima
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Costin Paval
Player
Gibril Diarra
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Kevin Krawietz
Player
Costin Paval
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
19 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Cengiz Aksu Recent Matches Played
Before:
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Darius Florin Pop
Player
Cengiz Aksu
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Cengiz Aksu
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Kanan Gasimov
62%
(
84 of
136)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
8
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
35%
(
18 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
46%
(
62 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
111)
133
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Cengiz Aksu
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Viacheslav Bielinskyi
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Hien Pham
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
56
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Cengiz Aksu
Player
Louis Van Herck
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more